Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460 is 524 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 24% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €64.79 vs €88.88
- Up to 42% better value when playing War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - €0.4 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 55 vs 84 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €64.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 393 minutes ago
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |