Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €39.87 vs €379.64
- Up to 89% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.4 vs €3.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4440 - 103 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €39.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16483 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.69/FPS
10%
Price, €
€379.64
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |