Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-3550 - 403 vs 379 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
403
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
639
54.70890410958904%
Multi-Core
1896
32.72350707628581%
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |