Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €250.1 vs €255.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than Core i5-3450 - 181 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-3450 - €1.41 vs €1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
169
93.37016574585635%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
95.27027027027026%
Price, €
€250.1
100%
Buy for €250.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36970 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.66
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
37.406947890818856%
Multi-Core
1781
24.6300649979256%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |