Buy on Amazon
€244.89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3243 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Valorant than Core i5-3450 - 871 vs 696 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €208.88 vs €244.89
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-3450 - €0.24 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-3450 Processore
Buy for €244.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18418 minutes ago
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
871
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3,9 GHz/4,9 GHz, 12 MB di cache)
Buy for €208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18418 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
