Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3476 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3450 - 201 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €189.99 vs €244.89
- Up to 40% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3450 - €0.95 vs €1.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €244.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2655 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |