Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2348 days newer than Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3450 - 183 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
171
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€239.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €239.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |