Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €250.1 vs €276.66
- Up to 1% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-11900F - €1.49 vs €1.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3450 - 185 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
168
90.81081081081082%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€250.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €250.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37690 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
99.33333333333333%
Price, €
€276.66
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
27.775218793182866%
Multi-Core
1781
19.419910587722168%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |