Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1564 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €196.96 vs €635.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €2.46 vs €11.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7373 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€196.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €196.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7372 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |