Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 299 vs 262 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €539.09 vs €635.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74425 minutes ago
Buy for €539.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
46.94178334561533%
Multi-Core
7454
45.37927675636186%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |