Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1042 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Athlon 3000G - 329 vs 284 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €81.67 vs €272.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-13600KF - €0.29 vs €0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €272 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
284
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |