Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 70% better in Starfield than Celeron G1610 - 73 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €72.66 vs €212.65
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €212.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
18.627022299956273%
Multi-Core
739
7.130451563103049%
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |