Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - 672 vs 562 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €143.11 vs €248.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400 - €0.25 vs €0.37 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €248 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |