Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - €72.66 vs €196.26
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 752 vs 681 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1025 minutes ago
Intel - Processore Intel Core I7-6700T, con socket LGA1151 in versione Tray, cache di 8 MB, 2,8 GHz
Buy for €196.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
36.010143702451394%
Multi-Core
739
20.723499719573752%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
