Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 534 vs 526 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €141.1 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €141.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74289 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
526
98.50187265917603%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
37%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
81.67832167832168%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |