Buy on Amazon
€99.94
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 15% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1610 - 122 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1610 - €0.82 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €88.88 vs €99.94
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.94
88%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-8100T processore 3,10 GHz 6 MB Cache intelligente
Buy for €99.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
