Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-8100T - 168 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €141.58 vs €199.59
- Up to 32% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-8100T - €0.84 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €199.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19317 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |