Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K and the cheaper Core i5-10400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €141.58 vs €164.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10600K - €0.68 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-10400F - 216 vs 209 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11946 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
89%
Price, €
€164.99
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11946 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |