Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 730 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €168.88 vs €379.64
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.27 vs €2.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14302 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
44%
Price, €
€379.64
44%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |