Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2793 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €7.54 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-540 - 178 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €7.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75902 minutes ago
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |