Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €33.4 vs €151.33
- Up to 78% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - €0.12 vs €0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4150 - 278 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €33.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13589 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
278
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
22%
Price, €
€151.33
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |