Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than Pentium G645T - 267 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €25.66 vs €155.51
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i3-10320 - €0.1 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
17.24137931034483%
Price, €
€155.51
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1573 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
254
95.13108614232209%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
23.066926575698503%
Multi-Core
606
13.09987029831388%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |