Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Pentium G4560 - 278 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €38.6 vs €166.94
- Up to 75% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - €0.15 vs €0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €166.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61774 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
259
93.16546762589928%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61774 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
707
45.938921377517865%
Multi-Core
1452
31.387808041504538%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |