Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €10.69 vs €186.17
- Up to 94% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i5-11600KF - €0.05 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i3-3225 - 212 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
195
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
5%
Price, €
€186.17
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €186.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |