Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €10.71 vs €163.5
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-11600 - €0.02 vs €0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 25% better in Valorant than Core i3-3225 - 863 vs 691 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
691
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2627 minutes ago
Buy for €163.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |