Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1858 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - €10.69 vs €188.88
- Up to 94% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8400 - €0.02 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3225 - 552 vs 454 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
454
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |