Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10320 - 223 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10320 - €0.72 vs €0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €151.33 vs €161.12
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.12
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |