Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3113 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700 - 153 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - €161.12 vs €188.88
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700 - €1.05 vs €1.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |