Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7600K - 212 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - €161.12 vs €198.88
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7600K - €0.76 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Buy for €198.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |