Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 131 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €88.88 vs €103.52
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103.52
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €103.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 430 minutes ago
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |