Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2192 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 42% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-7100 - 486 vs 342 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €107.6 vs €122.66
- Up to 39% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-7100 - €0.22 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €107.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5298 minutes ago
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |