Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 76% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1840 - 171 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €72.66 vs €159.18
- Up to 19% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-10320 - €0.75 vs €0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 53 vs 65 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
80.64516129032258%
Price, €
€159.18
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
97
56.72514619883041%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
32.81351526965562%
Multi-Core
854
18.460873324686556%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |