Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1369 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Celeron G1820 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |