Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2531 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €7.0 vs €289.0
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 74% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1820 - 230 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91657 minutes ago
Buy for €289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75770 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
22.430333485609868%
Multi-Core
825
6.785097458672588%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |