Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 1946 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 118 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
66.04651162790698%
Multi-Core
739
55.35580524344569%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
