Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 993 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
69.49429037520392%
Multi-Core
739
70.78544061302682%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G3460 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |