Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770K is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-4770K - €72.66 vs €175.66
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770K - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 165 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75385 minutes ago
Buy for €175.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
33.67588932806324%
Multi-Core
739
18.210941350418924%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |