Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2025 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron 847 - 179 vs 168 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €49.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |