Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1047 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 17 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than Celeron 847 - 666 vs 570 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
666
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |