Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 98 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 3865U - 339 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
339
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |