Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 1213 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 15 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron 3865U - 123 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |