Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 15 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 3865U - 147 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |