Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 611 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Athlon 200GE - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Celeron 3865U - 648 vs 594 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
648
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |