Buy on Amazon
€100
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 304 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €100.0 vs €105.57
- Up to 2% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.85 vs €0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 200GE - 122 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD Athlon 200GE processore 3,2 GHz Scatola 4 MB L3 - Socket AM4
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13717 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Processori (4C / 8T, 6 MB di cache, 4.2 GHz Max Boost) con scheda grafica Radeon RX Vega 11
Buy for €105.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13718 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
