Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 1311 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 15 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 3865U - 109 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€26.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €26.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |