Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 1677 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 15 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 3865U - 323 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
323
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €37.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |