Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 2079 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Celeron G1610 - 171 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 55 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Colfax | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |