Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 464 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Athlon 3000G - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
155
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |