Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 414 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 4% better in HITMAN 2 than Athlon 3000G - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €66.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
77.48987854251013%
Multi-Core
1975
26.6639665181585%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Colfax | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |