Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1127 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 182 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
47.044534412955464%
Multi-Core
992
13.392736600513027%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 250 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
